Does anyone know the ratio betwen liftoff power consumption and mid flight power consumption?

Thanks for your data. According to your figures (flight power consumption / take-off power consumption) = 55 to 69 %.
Previously I had read that this ratio was 60%. To increase the battery life, it would be interesting to know what makes the 15% difference … wind direction, chop over the water surface, propeller total surface, pitch ratio…?? Battery voltage going down along the session ?

That is impressive !

@Peter explains the “secret” of his setup a bit later: He seems to be using a “tandem” configuration (Please Peter correct me if I’m wrong). As both wings provide positive lift, the centre of lift of the plane is moved 20cm more aft compared to a traditional setup. The rear wing provides lift (plus balance with far less drag) that sums up to the front wing surface to allow early take-off with a “small” 600cm2 front wing.


On the right picture we can clearly see that the rider’s CG (his belly button to simplify) is nearly above the mast that is totally unconventional, sign of a rear wing providing positive lift which in turn forces the plane Neutral Point to move backwards…

HUGE CON: pitch unstable reaching 25 knots - experienced by the GONG Hellvator kitefoil in 2016, reason the tandem setup was abandoned in 2017 although loved by beginners for the added stability below 20 knots.

1 Like