interesting: high energy pack: 140A discharge but at 10sec pulsing, cycle life yes but C/2 discharge and C/4 charge…
reading : 18650 with 20C discharge capacity ??? like 1sec pulse
Great review and Lifts product is nothing short of spectacular! Love it!
The Lift eFoil folding propeller:
According to LIFT, in the ocean swell, a switched-off motor = a folded propeller = more battery life
A few remarks though. So far I was thinking that propeller blades :
1- needed to be three and not two for max efficiency (as Flying Rodeo is doing)
2- needed to be twisted in order to cut through water and not push water (Straight blades = swirl so perfect for food mixers / Twisted blades = efficient thrust for propeller blades)
Food for thoughts:
Here, the Lift team seem to favour the two-bladed and hardly twisted propellers as in the 2009 Yachtingmonthly.com propeller test above:
Maximum speed p94: untwisted two-bladed folding Flexofoil prop faster than
twisted three-bladed fixed version
"(...) Interestingly, some of the best performers were two-bladed props,
which are widely assumed to perform worse than three-blade versions."
Forward Bollard pull p95:
" the three-bladed folding Flexofold – generated a greater bollard pull than the
standard fixed prop" (with twisted blades)
the two-bladed folding Flexofold – generated equivalent bollard pull as the
standard three-bladed fixed prop with twisted blades.
It would be interesting to know the bollard pull of the LIFT folding prop versus the standard fixed and twisted three-bladed props delivered with the LIFT E1 and LIFT E1 Sport efoils.
1 Like
While three bladed propellers are more common than two bladed, they are in general not superior. On the contrary: propeller theory says clearly that efficiency decreases with the number of blades. The main reason for five or seven bladed propellers on large ships is to dampen oscillations (= noise prevention).
Propeller design is a trade-off, to improve a certain aspect means a decline in one or more other aspects. So you have to decide which goal is the most important, depending on the special application of the propeller.
Yes its proven the fewer the blades the more efficient a propeller is but there are trades offs.
The open propeller to me is really dangerious. Infact any propeller-driven surfboard is ban in Canada by transport Canada becuse they are so dangerious and easy for a mistake/accident to happen. Its only a matter of time before some with an open prop gets really badly injured.
What about the ducted props ? Is the Canadian market also closed to models offering a ducted solution (LIFT, Fliteboard, …) so only allowed to waterjets (VeConcept) ?
Regarding the possible prop ban, among the existing solutions:
1- There is a patented “safety propeller”: Colin Chamberlain from Australia has added a thickened leading edge to existing metal propellers with low impact on performance.
First licensee, Turning Point Propellers of Jacksonville Florida https://turningpointpropellers.com/ has produced a whole range of the “Safer” propeller under their brand name, “Aegis.”
The patent filled: WIPO - Search International and National Patent Collections
The patent in pdf format here. I am not sure it applies to efoils or hydrofoils engines though.
It would be interesting if sbdy with sound CNC skills (David @Flying_Rodeo ?) could make a prototype of a propeller with thick leading edges (Inventor trail) or thick blades (first licencee trail) to demonstrate the inventor claim stating very low impact on speed.
2- the LIFT folding prop has already rounded blades which could be thickened and, better still, fold when hitting a hard stuff (arm, finger, knee…).
3- ring propellers offer a solution (seems that there is an efficiency issue due to rotating quard increasing the wet surface)
1 Like
Continuing the discussion from The Lift E1 eFoil thread - info for the DIYer:
In my limited experience I have never fallen on the prop. I have fallen on the mast, the board and the wing but never on the prop! I have smashed my head, broken a rib and cut my arm. The sport has its inherent risks as all sports do, let common sense prevail. This is the reason I wear a helmet and impact vest.
3 Likes
I did talk with Transport Canada and they were very clear that ANY PROPELLER DRIVEN SURFBOARD with our without duct is ban in Canada is what I was told plus a $350 fine if caught using one. Jet driven surfboards are allowed.
Those rubber props I saw on this forum last year, they really are great for a family boat that does lots of towing…
You really have been through the wars!! An impact vest is a non-negotiable in my opinion. They make such a difference when you fall!
1 Like
Does your impact veste keep you from drowning if unconscious?
Some are rated 50N
I am looking for 100N
I have a dakine impact vest. Use it for wakeboarding, skiing, tow-surfing. It’s amazing.
Dont be too sure, that you will fulfill the law by a jet versus a propeller driven surfboat. I found this:
Remote-controlled Vessels and Propeller-driven Surfboards
1006 No person shall
- (a) tow themselves using a vessel that is operated by remote control; or
- (b) operate a propeller-driven surfboard-type vessel.
Prohibition Against Careless Operation
1007 No person shall operate a vessel in a careless manner, without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2010-91/page-18.html
It also could mean, that no surfboards or Efoils or whatever are allowed due to the risk of loosing control and the resulting risks for other persons.
Are you sure, that an impeller is not a propeller? And what is the difference in risk between a well ducted and hidden prop compared to a jet? Bans and laws can be changed, sometimes very quick. So if it turns out by any accident, that there is a high risk to be injured from a jet driven board which is out of control, the law can be changed. I personally think, the highest risk is the foil itself. On a surfboard the highest risk comes from the fin(s). Fins and foils are like swords, especially the trailing edge and the ends. I once dropped a mylar sail on a upward down laying surfboard and the fin cut it directly with ease.
1 Like
Well I did talk to them specifically about my jet foil board and jet surfboards are allowed but surfboard with propellers are not.
My point is that everyone must be aware of the rules in their areas, Canada is very strict when it comes to safety and the two regulations you stated above make perfect sense why they would not be more dangerous and are not allowed. I didnt make the rule, just sharing it.
I totally agree the foil wings can be deadly, I have fallen into them a couple times while learning and if it was not for my wetsuit, lifejacket and helmet my bruises could have been much worse as accidents happen.
1 Like
Yes, but if you can show, that you do not violate the consecuting rule, which gathers the sense and reason for the detailed rules above, you can become legal.
There are three regulations there PowerGlider each their own for safety reasons. If you want to change Transports Canada’s vessel reg’s go for it but as they stand now having gone over this specifically with them its a no go with propeller (impellers are not classes a propeller under their reg’s and free to be used within a jet drive).
I assume Canada would require the motorized surf board to be registered.
From what I found anything that floats powered by a motor in NY requires a registration. In order to get a registration I need a Hull ID. It appears you can get a hull ID by applying and saying it is a homemade boat.
Anybody no more about what the law is?
Yes we have very similar laws to USA, Germany, and many others in that regard. They all need hull identification numbers
Chris, do we have to register our boards in the USA? Does Lift?
Yes, and yes. Lift and other efoil/jet surfboards must supply the HIN number on each board, its up to you to register it.
1 Like