Hey guys, I have had many requests for the CAD files I created for my direct jetdrive build so here it is in the original build post above. I have include all parts needed for the jet end including impeller. Make sure you use these components to be successful:
500-1000KV Motor 56mm
300 Amp ESC
6-8AWG wires
Do not Print in PLA
Print in SLS Nylon or something strong
Ahhhh duh. I’m used to folks talking about lower KV on here so I wasn’t even thinking about 1000. So which is best since SSS makes all different KV motors?
Their recommended motor KV is for 24V . I would be running 48V to keep the amps down so 500kv would be the max kv. I have a SSS 360kv sitting on the shelf for my jetboard project, but have decided to ditch the 56mm motors because I dont think the 360kv has enough torque for a 64mm jet. I decided to go for an aps 250kv 8072 outrunner to get the torque I need for the jet.
So I was bored on my 6 hour flight so I decided on a new build based on various previous inspirations. Here is my next build. Waiting on machining and a new 3D printer extruder which died after printing the stator. I have no idea if this will fly or not but I have a motor to test on it.
Yes, I have the same concern as you can see here.
I’m testing different impellers and I improved since then.
In a few weeks, I should be able to do a full test.
It runs with Lipo 16S, SSS 56114 360KV, Esc Flier 400A
just wondering how did you approach regarding impeller size, pitch, and profile to work optimally with your motor. did you do any calculations or simulations?
interested in trying a direct impeller drive with a slightly larger motor sacrificing on efficiency but gaining on safety and glide in waves.
I did not use any formal calculations, however, I looked at what propellers which have been proven in a jet use case. The closest usage scenario I found was MHZ’s 58mm impeller and their motor setup. I figure once I get my 3D printed propeller working, I would just like to purchase the MHZ cnc impeller. So I based on my cad work on MHZ’s impeller diameter and motor. Also, I took into account my battery which is a 13S. The other critical factor was the esthetic design and the sleekness of the fuselage being the motor housing. I am eliminating the hydrofoil fuselage and just attaching the foil wings to the motor housing. With this in mind, the 64mm impeller from MHZ would have made it too wide and less hydrodynamic. This made it cheaper too because I just need to purchase the wings I like use whatever mast I can find. It was more of an intuitive approach based on form rather than all math.