The second line is mine and was later confirmed by Convert kg-cm to N-m - Conversion of Measurement Units
So the possible errors can only come from … Reacher Tech.
Can you confirm you got this new graph from them ? I can’t read the horizontal line unit (abscissa) so I have difficulties to figure it out …
Here is the data I got from them, hope it’s readable. They testet this motor with max.52 A.
Someone has an idea what the torque looks like from an SSS56114 at those Amps ( paired with 5:1 gear). Max. Amps continuous is 100A.
At $600 for one it’s pretty expensive to experiment and see if it might work. I think it would be in maytechs best interest to send out a test unit to one or two people so that they can review it. If it works well then they will have buyers.
The 192kv is on the high side but may still work.
Hi Eileen. I have some big interess on you product but with 130kv. Any more info like torque and price for one piece to try please? Yould be the same torque with 130KV? how many pole?
I think Maytech have their motors made by reacher tech so you could probably use reacher techs motor specs as a good guide. But why buy maytechs motor for $US600 when you can get one from reacher tech for $US410.
Thanks Eileen. This first set of data is a bit disappointing.
I am not a motor specialist but the flattering 9N.m is usually given at max rpm (16380= 195x84) and max voltage (20s 84V).
So I don’t know what to expect at half this voltage value since our voltage working range is 12 to 14s (44V to 52V nominal). So it is very unlikely that we can reach the required minimum torque for a efoil use with this 195KV motor as a direct drive = W I T H O U T _ _ G E A R
So, I’m looking forward to your 160, 130 and 100KV data as the max torque increases with the KV going down…