Prop design share

A few days ago I got out to the lake with the 2 blade prop that @kevintran has kindly shared. I had it 3D printed in MJF by PCBway. I logged some data with my iphone using the VESC app and have included some summaries below. My main point of comparison for the 2-blade prop is a Fliteboard 3-blade prop I’ve been using so far. I also included some results from the file @kevintran posted above.

My Setup: 14S ~1kwh battery, Flipsky 65161 120KV, Gong Curve LT 1450cm2 wing, 43cm stab, 100L Fliteboard, me@63kg dry.

The 2-blade prop is quieter than the Fliteboard. It also takes a bit more throttle input to get started and to make adjustments. I use a VX3 on the M throttle setting. Once I got used to this I found it a bit easier to handle than the Fliteboard prop which is more sensitive and requires a gentle finger.

For the VESC snapshots I trimmed to select a period on foil and just relied on the VESC tool’s Stats tab of the selected period. In my windy lake run I did my best to select equal upwind/downwind portions to minimize bias. Sorry my runs are so slow, I’m still building my confidence for sustaining higher speeds.

Kevin and I have very similar efficiency numbers, probably within margin of error. My Fliteboard prop is also so close it can’t be called a meaningful efficiency difference.

Kevin’s Run: Ocean (conditions?), 5:24, 0.47km, Avg Speed 22.6 km/h, Avg Effic 51.83 wh/km


Silas’ Run, 2-blade: Windy Lake, 17:42, 1.6km, Avg Speed 20.3 km/h, Avg Effic 51.39 wh/km

Silas’ Run, Fliteboard prop: No wind lake, 12:03, 1.04km, Avg Speed 18.17 km/h, Avg Effic 51.18 wh/km

I also attempted a more complete analysis of my data files. I determined average efficiency from 15 – 22.6 km/hr in 0.1km/hr increments using most of the data in both files. In this plot the Fliteboard prop appears consistently better. However I think the wind bias on the 2-blade data makes this a poor comparison. I may repeat this later if I get a nice calm day again.

4 Likes

Interesting comparison. Thanks

You might find your rig easier to ride if you increased speed to 25kmh. I find the foil sort of locks in and is a lot more predictable. However any speed over 30kmh starts to “leave a mark” when you wipe out😀

4 Likes

Thanks for sharing. Have you tried the maximum speeds of the two propellers? Is the pitch of the fliteboard propeller also 7 inches?

Today, the new 3D printed nylon two-blade propeller was tested, and the overall feeling was relatively stable, but the power was a little weaker than the three-blade propeller used before. The pitch of both propellers is 7 inches. I wonder if it would be better to use a 9-inch pitch. The propeller broke a little after one use, and the 3D printing was still not strong enough.



Interesting, that looks like an MJF print just like my copy, so it should have been pretty tough. Did it contact the duct housing? It chipped both blades.
How did you find the noise level? For me it seemed like a trade off losing some power and responsiveness for peace and quiet.

Anyone interested in max efficiency? I’ve wondered what max efficiency would look like, though it would require an assist to get on foil Foil pumping using low power efoil - #9 by mterea

1 Like

Hello guys!
@JvdZ I am really interested by the design of your 143mm diameter propeller! Can you change easily the pitch (max 152.4mm / 6inches) and pin (diameter on the photo below is 4,1) ? I would like to fit your propeller on my motor (Maytech MTI85165)
image

Thanks!

@Flo98 I don’t have the software anymore to modify the original files. The pitch of the blades is locked in the design, not a variable.
The prop might be a bit to small for a big motor unless you are running high RPM. I currently flying with a flying rodeo prop or fliteboard prop. The fliteboard prop is about 50eur, very good prop but you need to enlarge the bore to 12mm.

1 Like

@JvdZ The motor is 200Kv, that’s why i am trying to find a low pitch propeller because i draw too much current and thus my VESC overheats. The propeller i have is apparently an (old) fliteboard one. What pitch is yours? Trying to find or 3d print a propeller with 143mm diameter and low pitch (under 6 inches)

The diameter of the propeller can currently not exceed 143mm otherwise the blade would hit the fuselage, but i could design a 3d part between the mast and fuselage to lower it. But larger propeller means more drag and thus higher current?

What was the software you used to modifiy the original files?

Aha, I understand the low torque application. Files came from a very early version of SolidWorks, 2011 I think. Modelled the ugly way with splines/crossections to form the blade geometry… So no parametric pitch adjustments.

@Flo98 You can ask @superlefax = (https://propellerking.com) if he has a 3-4” pitch prop to offer. I think his props are 3d-printed so might be possible to get something even though it’s not on the site, if there is a design already tested.

that would be great, i will send him a pm!:slight_smile:

  • For the diameter, should i stay at 143mm or go larger? (more current is needed for larger propeller?)

  • For the pitch, you think 3-4"? I was advised some time ago FR, EML or Easy Foil 6” pitch. But these propellers are more than 143mm diameter

Otherwise i just started to use Pacificmeister parametric propeller but i am getting fusion error when i try to change ductGap (to change diameter of the blades) and not sure also how to change the pitch

one solution i see now is to use this 5’’ pitch duct and i have to cut it to reduce diameter to 143mm:

3-4” assumption comes from that the most of us run 6-8” with 120kV motors.
Scale pitch with kV:
6x120/200=3.6
8x120/200=4.8

Your esc would probably be happier in the lower span of this, but 5” could be worth trying.

You don’t want a larger prop since that has a double effect on increased current. Flipsky prop needs to be cut down to roughly what you use today or less

@Larsb … please excuse my ignorance on prop design but what does that calculation illustrate?
Interested to know for my own lack of knowledge on tbe dark arts of prop design🤔

No dark arts, only estimations and some physics behind. The numbers below are examples of what is working setups to compare against, not laws but they serve their purpose in this calc.

The flite prop (from memory) has about 7” pitch, gets you to roughly 120x44x7x0.0254x60x0.85, about 48kph with a common 12s 120kV setup. You don’t need much more :smiley:

Flo has issues with overheating the vesc, the current needed to create torque with his 200kV motor is (at least part of) the issues.

On a 120kV motor about 100-150A is needed to get up with good setups, let’s take 100A as an example, this is about 8Nm of torque, to get same torque on a 200kV motor you need 200/120*100A=170A
Resistive heating increases by the square of current, the relative losses are then 170^2/100^2=2.9 - so it’s close to 3x higher heating

It’s easy to see that esc heating increases and could cause issues. Lowering the load on the motor is one possibility to decrease the heating, a prop of the same area and diameter but different pitch will achieve this (or a smaller one).

The torque to drive the propeller is proportional to pitch, and therefore a propeller pitch scaled with kV (7x120/200=4.2) would lower the current back down to 100A (but with a higher rpm to get same speed and power)

This calculation has a lot of assumptions, not 100% correct also since propeller efficiency seems to peak around pitch/dia=1
(i don’t know why really) so a 4.2” pitch / 6” dia propeller will probably have a bit lower efficiency - but can help with the esc heating.

3 Likes

thanks for this detailed explanation @Larsb !!
I actually found today and ordered a 4.2 pitch propeller with 150mm diameter

Where do you find the pitch of this prop?

I contacted Maytech today, according to them it’s 4.2 pitch

I hope they are right

Indeed I got two low pitch pink lady’s at home with 4" but they fit to an outrunner motor (6374/6384). I use them on my 20km/h Turbo SUP.

2 Likes